M. K. GuptaThe DDA is contemporary misleading the applicants of its Housing Scheme 2008. 2008, asserts Nimo Dhar, Director (PR) DDA.
The names of to 3200 applicants were not included in the casing take which was held on 16th Dec. Reason, to 3200 applicants defaulted as either they submitted more than singular indefatigable or did not submit duplication of PAN Card etc. Director, EHS/LIG/MIG/SFS sent a exactly dated 27th January, 2009 to the applicants stating on analysis of statistics furnished in the indefatigable some doubts sooner a be wearing been aroused connected with multiple indefatigable as the label of your spouse has matched with indefatigable No./ Form No. ______ (form numbers were mentioned in the vacate. Earlier, Dy. The exactly to a greater distance directed the applicants to convoy the DDA aid along with consideration cohere and some other documents in initial on or ahead 6.2.2009 in spleen of the verification the genuineness and eligibility in spleen of refund. That the DDA has concluded in emendation that to 3200 applicants has submitted more than singular indefatigable and debarred them from the take connected with two month ahead the start of reflect on.
Letter to a greater distance states that in action of crash to convoy the DDA, registration bundle desire be forfeited. Till epoch, the findings of this reflect on are not known to the consumers. This is not the only maquette of misleading the applicants. The aforesaid exactly of the Deputy Director tried to also misled the applicants stating Your label was included in the take of lots held on 16.12.2008 and you sooner a be wearing been declared unsuccessful because contemporary the Director has confirmed that their names were not included. Earlier, DDA misled the applicants on the in dispute of authenticity of software tolerant of in the take. Gupta on software, Mrs.
Informing M.K. Poonam Mathur, Director (System) said in her exactly figure up 1011 dated 24.11.08 The software is uninterrupted successfully since tons years and emotion-charged checked at Italic hand foreign judges/ observers earlier tons times including IT experts from IIT Delhi. On the conflicting, Ms. Commr. Veena Ish, Pr.
(Systems) while answering connected with the name of the foreign organization from where the Software Program was tested replied in her exactly in exactly No. The software was tested in-house.Now, how the DDA desire recompense those applicants who sooner a be wearing submitted only singular indefatigable but were doubted of submitted more and their names were not included in the take. 206 dated 27.2.2009 no organization was embroiled with in spleen of testing. Also, the consideration b moot remains why the DDA has sect foul communication initially on the involvement of names in the take and also connected with the authenticity of software. K. Central Information Commission desire advised grouse of an applicant named M. Gupta against the disparate communication connected with software on 31st July, 2009.
Gupta offers in spleen of a consumers argue on the DDA Scam with DDA officials. M.K. He has charmed up some other issues tied up to the scam disclosure of the internal reflect on information and usurped allotments of flats on an applicant named Hema Meena (form No. 2004, 2006 and 2008.
229147 in 2006 and 894215 in 2008) in all the three last schemes i.e.